GST Return Filing under Composition Scheme
CBIC Prescribes Special Procedure for Payment & Return Filing under Composition Scheme
April 24, 2019
gst council
More Flexibility on the use of ITC says GST Council
April 26, 2019

HC Says Interest is Payable on Total Tax Liability, ITC included

Input Tax Credit

Megha Engineering & Infrastructures Ltd. vs. The Commissioner of Central Tax

[TS-248-HC-2019(TELandAP)-NT]

Telangana HC (Hyderabad) dismissed the assessee’s writ and held that interest u/s 50 of CGST Act, 2017 is payable on total tax liability. This also includes a portion which is liable to be set-off against ITC where the returns were filed belatedly. It rejected the assessee’s reliance upon recommendations of GST Council made during its 31st meeting upon the contention that interest is to be calculated only on net tax liability after deducting ITC.

The HC remarked that, “Scheme of the Act makes a distinction between

(i) the entitlement to take credit which comes first;

(ii) the actual entry of credit in the electronic credit ledger, which comes next; and

(iii) the actual payment from out of the credit, which comes last”.

On perusing Section 41 (1), it explained that a person gets credited with the input tax, in his electronic credit ledger, only upon his filing the return on a self-assessment basis, after which, utilization of same for payment of self-assessed output tax, arises u/s 41(2).

Thus, “Even in respect of the input tax credit available in the electronic credit ledger, there is a necessity to make payment” states HC, while further expounding that, “until a return is filed as self-assessed, no entitlement to credit and no actual entry of credit in the electronic credit ledger takes place”.

Furthermore, liability to pay interest u/s 50 (1) is self-imposed and also automatic, without any determination by anyone and “If no payment is made, the mere availability of the same, there in the cloud, will not tantamount to actual payment”. Consequently, the HC held that payment of tax liability, partly in cash and partly in form of a claim for Input Tax Credit was made beyond the period prescribed and hence, liability to pay interest u/s 50 (1) arose automatically.

The judgment was delivered by Justice V. Ramasubramanian and Justice P. Keshava Rao. The assessee was represented by Mr. Gandra Mohan Rao while Revenue was represented by Mr. B. Narasimha Sarma.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

− 3 = 3

HostBooks has been featured in






Want to know more about HostBooks?

We’ll help you out!






3 + 4 =