hb-logo-white-texthb-logo-white-texthb-logo-white-texthb-logo-white-text
  • Solutions
    • Food & Beverages
    • Hospitality
    • Manufacturing
    • Retail
    • Distribution
    • PayRoll
    • Complaince
  • Agentic AI
    • Agentic AI Overview
    • Zeno Document Processing
  • Knowledge Center
    • Blog
    • Case Study
    • Career
    • About Us
    • Press Release
  • Partner
  • Contact Us
  • Solutions
    • Food & Beverages
    • Hospitality
    • Manufacturing
    • Retail
    • Distribution
    • PayRoll
    • Complaince
  • Agentic AI
    • Agentic AI Overview
    • Zeno Document Processing
  • Knowledge Center
    • Blog
    • Case Study
    • Career
    • About Us
    • Press Release
  • Partner
  • Contact Us
✕

Rule – 70, Second withdrawal

Published by Law@HostBooks at March 27, 2018
Categories
  • All Rules
  • Income-tax Rules
Tags

70. (1) Save as in sub-rule (2) 85[and sub-rule (3)], a second withdrawal shall not be permitted until the sum first withdrawn has been fully repaid.

87[(2) A withdrawal may be permitted—

(a)   for any purpose specified in clause (d) or clause (e) of sub-rule (1) of rule 68 notwithstanding that the sum withdrawn earlier for any purpose has not been repaid ;
(b)   for any other purpose specified in sub-rule (1) of rule 68 notwithstanding that any sum withdrawn earlier for any purpose specified in clause (d) or clause (e) of the said sub-rule (1) has not been repaid.]

88[(3) A withdrawal, referred to in clause (a) of sub-rule (2), of an amount equal to the difference between the amount of withdrawal admissible under sub-rule (2A) of rule 69 as on the date of application and the amount actually withdrawn by the employee for the purpose specified in clause (d) of sub-rule (1) of rule 68 any time during six years preceding the 3rd day of October, 1981, may be permitted to the employee, whose pay does not exceed rupees 89[five thousand] per month, subject to the following conditions, namely :—

(i)   the employee had availed of the first withdrawal for purchase of a site and now proposes to construct a house on the site so purchased; or
(ii)   the employee had availed of the first withdrawal for making initial payment towards allotment or purchase of a house from any of the agencies referred to in the second proviso to clause (d) of sub-rule (1) of rule 68 and now proposes to withdraw the amount for completing the transaction and for acquiring ownership of the house so purchased; or
(iii)   the employee had availed of the first withdrawal for construction of a house but the said construction could not be completed due to shortage of funds.
 
Reference: www.incometaxindia.gov.in

Share
Law@HostBooks
Law@HostBooks

Built for scale and speed, HostBooks empowers forward-thinking businesses to simplify workflows, stay compliant, and unlock smarter decisions.

1st Floor, Nimai Tower, 412-415,Udyog Vihar Phase 4, Sector 18, Gurugram, Haryana 122015, India.

    Solutions

    • Food & Beverages
    • Hospitality
    • Manufacturing
    • Retail
    • Distribution
    • Payroll
    • Compliance

    About HostBooks

    • About Us
    • Press Release
    • Careers
    • Whats New
    • Contact Us

    Sitemap

    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Data & Document Management Policy
    © HostBooks. All Rights Reserved.